| |
Excerpt from "Visitors' Comments" page:
INTERVIEW WITH A CONCERNED
CITIZEN, WHO HAS WORKED IN
OTTAWA'S WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PROCESSING FOR 25 YEARS
This information has put a new twist on WHY the city is so bent on
connecting Munster to the City’s sewer system
--- with a permanent lagoon or two— regardless of cost, and
regardless of its detriment to the environment.
(Condensation of 2 ½-hour
Interview)
Why are you talking with us?
"I
approached you because I am a concerned Citizen, too. What I see
on the website is good, (as far as it goes), but that’s only the
tip of the iceberg. It bothers me, as a taxpayer, to see the City
waste so much money on sewage handling systems and approaches that
have consistently failed in the past.
"I see our present approach of centralized
wastewater servicing
for outlying communities, as being completely unsustainable."
How much further out do we
intend to collect sewage? We can’t properly handle what we collect
now. It’s going to lead to more and more clogged pipelines, more
forcemain breaks, and bigger and bigger raw sewage bypasses to the
Ottawa River at peak flow periods.
Every day that goes by, the City
is going further in the opposite direction of its eventual need to
have tertiary quality output. The way we’re going now, when that
day comes, the costs will be enormous. What we should be doing,
presently, is providing tertiary treatment —locally— for these
rural communities, and then there will be that much less
conversion to do later in the core area."
The Problem:
"Human waste should be treated
as quickly as possible after it is produced. That’s why treatment
at source is so good. The longer the distance sewage has to be
moved through a forcemain, the higher is the risk that it will
turn ‘septic’. This creates four additional problems:
1.) Slow moving sewage goes
septic, settles out and builds up on the inside of the forcemains,
until they are clogged. The City presently spends millions of
dollars per year (usually in private contracts), unclogging and
venting sewer forcemains (such as the Glen Cairn Trunk Sanitary
Sewer), and cleaning out pumping stations (such as the Acres Road
Pump Station).
2.) Sewage as it goes septic
produces Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) gas, and Methane gas.
This produces very annoying and unhealthy odours in public places,
and creates risk of explosions, if not dispersed quickly or
otherwise dealt with, always at additional expense.
|
3.) Sewer gasses are very
corrosive, resulting in shortened lifetimes of exposed
materials. That’s the reason why the pipeline under Eagleson
Road, which was first installed about twenty years ago, had to
be replaced in 1999, and why extensive venting of the Glen
Cairn |
|
 |
|
Septic gas
vents are approximately 100M apart |
|
|
 |
|
Septic gas filter , north of
Queensway, on Timm Road (built 2002) |
|
|
Trunk (which you can see
along East side of Eagleson, between Robertson Road and the
Queensway) (photo: above left).
Also, on the North side of the Queensway, (on
Timm Road), just East of Eagleson, note the work currently
being done to install an air-scrubbing exhaust-filter system
there (photo: above right).
|
4.) When sewage arrives, in
‘septic’ condition, at the Gloucester treatment plant (ROPEC), it
is much more costly and difficult to treat, and if it’s added too
quickly to the primary treatment system, it can interfere with the
digestion process."
The City’s (Wrong) Approach to the
Problem —and what it means for Munster:
"The City plans to
permanently use lagoons in Munster and Richmond, (and all future
hook-ups of remote rural villages), to store solids during non
peak-flow periods. Obviously, if, in Munster’s case, an 8-inch, or
10-inch pipeline is needed to avoid too much storage time in
lagoons during peak flows, then during the other 10-or-so months,
when the flows have dropped from 1,900 M3 per day to
575 M3 per day, then all the above problems (of sepsis,
gas generation, and clogging) would occur in the pipeline.
Therefore, the City’s plan
is to have one (preferably two) lagoon cells at Munster, to retain
solids for the remainder of the year, when the pipeline size is
too big to move solids quickly. That would be the case for 9 to 11
months of the year, and, that is the part the residents haven’t
been properly informed about. By sending just the supernatant
lagoon water through the pipelines, during the "average-flow"
volumes, for 9-11 months of the year, the City hopes to reduce the
occurrences of clogging. But Munster will be stuck with
continuous-use lagoons."
THE BIG "WHY?"
If it costs more to do what the City
wants, and it’s more harmful to the environment, why is the city
so determined to avoid on-site treatment in Munster?
"You’ve touched on a few
reasons on your website. But, as I see it, you haven’t discussed
the biggest reason, of all.
The City is trying to
harvest all water it can, from wherever it can (preferably without
the troublesome solids), to flush out (in this case), the Glen
Cairn collector which has been a real problem area. That’s why
they want supernatant from Munster and Richmond to move things
faster through the lines, downstream. That’s why there was even an
attempt, at one point, to move the Trail Road leachate through the
Eagleson forcemain.
Just watch: when the problems
persist with the Glen Cairn and Tri-Township collectors, their
next "solution" will probably be, to put solids-retention lagoons
in Carp and Stittsville! Manotick may also have lagoons in its
future.
This was the same problem (i.e.:
slow-moving sewage) the City’s ‘experts’ created, which caused the
oversized Ottawa South collector failure, and this is the reason
they had to put the big gas exhaust vents on Eagleson Road, north
of Robertson Road.
You will likely never get a
direct admission that this is the reason for pushing for the
Munster pipeline, because it has absolutely no economic or
environmental justification, (compared with the local treatment
plant options). However, that IS their internal logic ...such as
it is. Throwing good money after bad, doesn’t seem to faze them,
here.
But,
the City can’t go on
forever, grabbing water from outlying areas to flush out their
ever-expanding systems, and leaving the solids behind.
"That’s not Wastewater Treatment!"
It’s costly, it’s wasteful
of our water resources and it’s completely unsustainable.
And at peak flow periods of spring, it’s going to lead to
ever-increasing incidence of raw sewage bypasses, every time
lagoon retention capacities are exceeded, at all these new
connection locations (such as Munster). That’s why I contacted
you."
How do you see this
getting resolved?
"It’s a huge problem and it’s
out of control. There is so much secrecy, and the left hand
doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. In fact, no one seems
to know what they’re doing. They’re just making things worse.
Outside consulting engineers are being brought in all the time, to
advise on how to correct the problems, and their ideas fail too; a
real case of the blind leading the blind.
As for Munster, a local
treatment plant is the only way to go. In fact, Richmond should
have one, as well, for their future expansion. Then, between it’s
existing pipeline and a treatment plant, both could be operated
efficiently, while Richmond population grows. Forget lagoons,
forget more (and bigger) forcemains in the future!"
Thanks for the interview.
"Thanks for what you’re doing,
and for letting me get this off my chest. And, Good Luck to
Munster!"
"Concerned Citizen"
Name withheld by request.
(March 16, 2002) |
|